🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to release them online.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts said the seeming leak could aid AI companies searching for material to train their models.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a external actor collected public metadata and used illicit tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, said the breached music would likely be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated data is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free version of the service”. The executive said it could also enable tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.